AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 173.697
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 173.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21785 versus 14497
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 versus 888
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 versus 66235
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 209.509
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 3686.851
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.133 versus 21.941
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1036.448
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 11536
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 11536
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14599 versus 8499
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 21785 versus 14497 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 versus 888 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 versus 66235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 209.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 3686.851 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 versus 21.941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1036.448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 11536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 11536 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14599 versus 8499 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14497 | 21785 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 935 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66235 | 138583 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 394.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 5461.22 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 41.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 173.697 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1987.605 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 14599 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 83 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 18,600 million |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
