AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 9% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1465 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Etwa 12% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Etwa 39% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 173.697
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 173.697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3358 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21784 vs 14500
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 vs 889
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 vs 66222
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 vs 209.509
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 vs 3686.851
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.133 vs 21.941
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 vs 1036.448
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 11536
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 11536
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14612 vs 8501
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21784 vs 14500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 vs 889 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 vs 66222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 vs 209.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 vs 3686.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 vs 21.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 vs 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 11536 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14612 vs 8501 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 | 21784 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66222 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8501 | 14612 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | Turing |
Codename | Navi 10 | TU102 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $350 | $999 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 177 | 83 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $1,279.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texturfüllrate | 248.4 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 18,600 million |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |