AMD Radeon RX 580 versus AMD FirePro W5100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 and AMD FirePro W5100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 930 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 44.64 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 768
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 6000 MHz
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 2978
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 531
- 3.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 11724
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 35.15
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 versus 838.518
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 3.199
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 57.354
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 163.258
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 4397
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 4397
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 31 March 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 930 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 44.64 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 768 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 6000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 versus 2978 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 11724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 versus 838.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 3688 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5100
- 230.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,428 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 185 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,428 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3349 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 | AMD FirePro W5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 2978 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 | 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 | 11724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 838.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 | AMD FirePro W5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Bonaire |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 31 March 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 341 | 627 |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz | 930 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | 1,428 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 2,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 171 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Half Length | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |