AMD Radeon RX 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 1006 MHz
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 128.8 billion / sec
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1536
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 5% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 185 Watt versus 195 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2048 MB
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 5590
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 531
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 18376
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 46.086
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 versus 989.685
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 4.645
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 36.463
- 6.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 99.577
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 3666
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 3306
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 3666
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 3306
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 22 March 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 1006 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 128.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1536 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt versus 195 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2048 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 versus 5590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 18376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 46.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 versus 989.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 4.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 36.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 99.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3306 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- 498.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,090.4 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2004 versus 1005
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 versus 1005 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 5590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 | 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 | 18376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 46.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 989.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 4.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 36.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 99.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3306 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 | 2004 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GK104 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 22 March 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 341 | 544 |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $579.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | 12.83 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz | 1006 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | 3,090.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | 128.8 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 195 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 10.0" (25.4 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | Two 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2048 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |