AMD Radeon RX 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 109 billion / sec
- Environ 38% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1664
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 1142.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 28498
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 105.107
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 8.737
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 35.714
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 490.688
- 2.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 versus 369
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 19 September 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 109 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1664 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 versus 369 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- 632.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,920 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 148 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 versus 8827
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 versus 1022.932
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 versus 11281
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 versus 11281
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt versus 185 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 versus 8827 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 versus 1022.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 versus 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 versus 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 3695 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 | 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 | 369 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GM204 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 19 September 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $329 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 341 | 371 |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $407.76 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | 28.59 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | 3,920 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1664 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | 109 billion / sec |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pins |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 580 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
ATIFireMV 2260
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000
