AMD Radeon RX 590 versus AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 590 and AMD Radeon RX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1469 MHz versus 1257 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1340 MHz
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 222.48 GTexel/s versus 192.96 GTexel/s
- Environ 15% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 7.1 TFLOPs versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 6% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9374 versus 8827
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 versus 767
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 45591 versus 39028
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 137.469 versus 116.142
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 versus 1022.932
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.352 versus 9.235
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 versus 84.034
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 762.142 versus 607.721
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 versus 11281
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3695
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 versus 11281
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3695
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1081 versus 1005
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 versus 18 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz versus 1257 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1340 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s versus 192.96 GTexel/s |
Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9374 versus 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 versus 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45591 versus 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 versus 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 versus 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 versus 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 versus 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 versus 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 versus 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 versus 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1081 versus 1005 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9374 | 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45591 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1081 | 1005 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 30 | Polaris 20 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | Radeon RX 500 Series |
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 280 | 341 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | 36 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs | 6.2 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | 42.88 GP/s |
Render output units | 32 | 32 |
Stream Processors | 2304 | 2304 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Texture Units | 144 | 144 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 185 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |