NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus AMD Radeon RX 590

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 590 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

versus

AMD Radeon RX 590

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1469 MHz
Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1545 MHz
Environ 75% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 175 Watt
Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10162 versus 9390
Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55772 versus 45917
Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 versus 137.469
Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 versus 762.142
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 versus 13383
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 versus 13383

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	22 Nov 2019 versus 15 November 2018
Vitesse du noyau	1530 MHz versus 1469 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz versus 1545 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt versus 175 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	10162 versus 9390
Geekbench - OpenCL	55772 versus 45917
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	178.014 versus 137.469
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	787.025 versus 762.142
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13569 versus 13383
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13569 versus 13383

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590

Environ 61% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 222.48 GTexel/s versus 138.0 GTexel/s
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 versus 750
Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 versus 1961.932
Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.352 versus 11.169
Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 versus 109.29
Environ 2% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4757 versus 4663

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	222.48 GTexel/s versus 138.0 GTexel/s
Taille de mémore maximale	8 GB versus 4 GB
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	789 versus 750
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2083.862 versus 1961.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	12.352 versus 11.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	139.477 versus 109.29
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 versus 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 versus 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 versus 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 versus 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4757 versus 4663

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10162

9390

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

750

789

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

55772

45917

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

178.014

137.469

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1961.932

2083.862

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.169

12.352

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

109.29

139.477

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

787.025

762.142

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13569

13383

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13569

13383

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3359

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

4663

4757

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	AMD Radeon RX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark	10162	9390
PassMark - G2D Mark	750	789
Geekbench - OpenCL	55772	45917
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	178.014	137.469
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1961.932	2083.862
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.169	12.352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	109.29	139.477
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	787.025	762.142
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13569	13383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13569	13383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4663	4757

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	AMD Radeon RX 590
Essentiel
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Nom de code	TU116	Polaris 30
Date de sortie	22 Nov 2019	15 November 2018
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	277	278
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Conception		Radeon RX 500 Series
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$279
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz	1545 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1530 MHz	1469 MHz
Processus de fabrication	12 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.416 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280
Pixel fill rate	55.20 GPixel/s	49.54 GP/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	138.0 GTexel/s	222.48 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	175 Watt
Compte de transistor	6600 million	5,700 million
Unités de Compute		36
Performance á point flottant		7.1 TFLOPs
Render output units		32
Stream Processors		2304
Texture Units		144
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
HDMI
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	9 inches (229 mm)	241 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	350 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Largeur	Dual-slot
Soutien API
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	192 GB/s	256 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 bit	256 bit
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	GDDR5
Vitesse de mémoire		8000 MHz
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support