AMD Radeon RX 6800 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1700 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 36% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2105 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22313 versus 21784
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 973 versus 935
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 versus 394.035
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 versus 41.133
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 versus 173.697
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 versus 1987.605
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 16306 versus 14606
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1700 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2105 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22313 versus 21784 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 973 versus 935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 versus 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 versus 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 versus 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 versus 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16306 versus 14606 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 versus 126207
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 16162
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 16162
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 versus 126207 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 16162 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22313 | 21784 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 973 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 126207 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16162 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16162 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16306 | 14606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Navi 21 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $579 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 76 | 83 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 2105 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 60 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1700 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | |
Pixel fill rate | 202.1 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 505.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 512.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |