AMD Radeon RX 6800 versus NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6800 and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1700 MHz versus 1304 MHz
- Environ 46% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2105 MHz versus 1442 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 505.2 GTexel/s versus 322.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 3584
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1430 MHz
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22112 versus 15149
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 982 versus 836
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 129091 versus 89068
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 versus 355.937
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 versus 25.191
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 versus 144.928
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 versus 1056.078
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 versus 1 October 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1700 MHz versus 1304 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2105 MHz versus 1442 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 505.2 GTexel/s versus 322.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 3584 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 16 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1430 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22112 versus 15149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 versus 836 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 129091 versus 89068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 versus 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 versus 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 versus 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 versus 1056.078 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Environ 6% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 235 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16640 versus 16162
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 versus 3719
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 versus 3373
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16640 versus 16162
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 versus 3719
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 versus 3373
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16640 versus 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 versus 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16640 versus 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 versus 3373 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22112 | 15149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 | 836 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 129091 | 89068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16162 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16162 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Navi 21 | GP100 |
Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 1 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $579 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 85 | 88 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 2105 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 60 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1700 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 202.1 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 505.2 GTexel/s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 235 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 15,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 10,329 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 512.0 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1430 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |