AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 versus Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1240 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- 29.3x plus de pipelines: 704 versus 24
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2106 versus 1042
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 versus 241
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14583 versus 4592
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 versus 27.062
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.578 versus 273.504
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 versus 1.777
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 versus 19.939
- 8.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 versus 31.881
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3455 versus 1397
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 versus 878
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3107 versus 2227
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3455 versus 1397
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 versus 878
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3107 versus 2227
- 19.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1201 versus 62
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 1 September 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1240 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 704 versus 24 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2106 versus 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 versus 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14583 versus 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 versus 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 versus 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 versus 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 versus 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 versus 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 versus 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 versus 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 versus 62 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2106 | 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14583 | 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 | 62 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Raven | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 795 | 1380 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1240 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,760 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 24 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |