AMD Radeon Sky 500 versus AMD FirePro W7000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Sky 500 and AMD FirePro W7000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Sky 500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4709 versus 4247
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 versus 542
- 4.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 74902 versus 17788
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.669 versus 52.467
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.352 versus 4.886
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.633 versus 85.472
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5116 versus 3359
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5116 versus 3359
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2013 versus 13 June 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4709 versus 4247 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 versus 542 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74902 versus 17788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.669 versus 52.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.352 versus 4.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.633 versus 85.472 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5116 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5116 versus 3359 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W7000
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1148.367 versus 1096.68
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 268.49 versus 247.642
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6475 versus 3585
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 2116
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6475 versus 3585
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 2116
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1148.367 versus 1096.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.49 versus 247.642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6475 versus 3585 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 2116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6475 versus 3585 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 2116 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Sky 500
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Sky 500 | AMD FirePro W7000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4709 | 4247 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 542 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74902 | 17788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.669 | 52.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1096.68 | 1148.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.352 | 4.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.633 | 85.472 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.642 | 268.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3585 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2116 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5116 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3585 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2116 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5116 | 3359 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Sky 500 | AMD FirePro W7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Pitcairn | Pitcairn |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2013 | 13 June 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 517 | 514 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz | 950 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,432 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 76 GTexel / s | 76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 350 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | 4 |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | Full Height / Full Length |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm | 242 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 154 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |