NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q versus AMD Radeon Sky 500
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon Sky 500 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1152 MHz versus 950 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 46% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 4800 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5358 versus 4709
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 versus 1096.68
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 versus 5.352
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 versus 247.642
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 versus 3585
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 versus 2116
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 versus 3585
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 versus 2116
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 versus 27 March 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1152 MHz versus 950 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 4800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5358 versus 4709 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 versus 1096.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 versus 5.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 versus 247.642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 versus 3585 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 versus 2116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 versus 3585 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 versus 2116 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Sky 500
- Environ 12% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 76 GTexel / s versus 68.02 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 768
- Environ 12% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,432 gflops versus 2,177 gflops
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 versus 422
- 3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 74902 versus 19807
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.669 versus 54.188
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.633 versus 82.067
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5116 versus 3358
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5116 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 76 GTexel / s versus 68.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 768 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,432 gflops versus 2,177 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 versus 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74902 versus 19807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.669 versus 54.188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.633 versus 82.067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5116 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5116 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Sky 500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon Sky 500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5358 | 4709 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19807 | 74902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | 54.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | 1096.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | 5.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | 89.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | 247.642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | 3585 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | 2116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 5116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | 3585 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | 2116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 5116 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon Sky 500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GP107 | Pitcairn |
Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 | 27 March 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 519 | 517 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1417 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1152 MHz | 950 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,177 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.02 GTexel / s | 76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Longeur | 242 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 154 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |