AMD Radeon Sky 500 versus AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Sky 500 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Sky 500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 3.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4800 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.633 versus 69.23
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5116 versus 3359
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5116 versus 3359
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2013 versus 31 January 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.633 versus 69.23 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5116 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5116 versus 3359 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Environ 18% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 89.6 GTexel / s versus 76 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1280
- Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,867 gflops versus 2,432 gflops
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 versus 74902
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 versus 54.669
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 versus 1096.68
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 versus 5.352
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 versus 247.642
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 versus 3585
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 versus 2116
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 versus 3585
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 versus 2116
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 89.6 GTexel / s versus 76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,867 gflops versus 2,432 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 versus 74902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 versus 54.669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 versus 1096.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 versus 5.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 versus 247.642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 versus 3585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 2116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 versus 3585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 2116 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Sky 500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Sky 500 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4709 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74902 | 82144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.669 | 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1096.68 | 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.352 | 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.633 | 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.642 | 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3585 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2116 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5116 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3585 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2116 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5116 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Sky 500 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2013 | 31 January 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 518 | 519 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $449 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,432 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 76 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 4,313 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 242 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 154 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Sky 500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Sky 500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 PRO
AMDRadeon Sky 500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3500M
AMDRadeon Sky 500 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
AMDRadeon Sky 500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850A
AMDRadeon Sky 500 vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q
AMDRadeon Sky 500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
