AMD Radeon VII versus AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon VII and AMD Radeon Pro Duo pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon VII
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 75% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1750 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 17% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 300 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 500 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16690 versus 8164
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 786 versus 765
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 89411 versus 53806
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 versus 141.474
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 versus 3621.344
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 versus 13.132
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11724 versus 10141
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11724 versus 10141
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 versus 26 April 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 500 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16690 versus 8164 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 786 versus 765 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89411 versus 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 versus 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 versus 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 versus 13.132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 versus 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 versus 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 432.24 GT/s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 2x 4096 versus 3840
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.973 versus 69.256
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 799.933 versus 499.927
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 3360
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 3360
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 432.24 GT/s |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 versus 3840 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 versus 69.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 versus 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 versus 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 versus 3360 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16690 | 8164 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 786 | 765 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89411 | 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9294 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | Vega 20 | Capsaicin |
Conception | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | reference |
Génération GCN | 5th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $1,499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 214 | 188 |
Prix maintenant | $699.99 | $849 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.74 | 17.05 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 60 | 128 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2x 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 3840 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,230 million | 8,900 million |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 305 mm | 277 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 W | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | DirectX® 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 1024 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR |