AMD Radeon VII vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon VII and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon VII
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16690 vs 8137
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 786 vs 745
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89406 vs 53806
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 vs 141.474
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 vs 3621.344
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 vs 13.132
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11724 vs 10141
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11724 vs 10141
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2019 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1750 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16690 vs 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 786 vs 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89406 vs 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 vs 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 vs 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 vs 13.132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 5.2x more texture fill rate: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 432.24 GT/s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 3840
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.973 vs 69.256
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 799.933 vs 499.927
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3360
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 432.24 GT/s |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 3840 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 vs 69.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 vs 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16690 | 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 786 | 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89406 | 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9292 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Capsaicin |
Design | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | reference |
GCN generation | 5th Gen | |
Launch date | 7 February 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 214 | 188 |
Price now | $699.99 | $849 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.74 | 17.05 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2x 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 3840 | |
Texture fill rate | 432.24 GT/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,230 million | 8,900 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm | 277 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 W | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | DirectX® 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR |