AMD Radeon VII versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon VII and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon VII
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 1392 MHz
- Environ 26% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1750 MHz versus 1392 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 432.24 GT/s versus 66.82 GTexel / s
- 5x plus de pipelines: 3840 versus 768
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 4 GB
- 285.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 7 GB/s
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16398 versus 6332
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 versus 650
- 4.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 91678 versus 20732
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 versus 75.758
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 versus 843.503
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 versus 5.071
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.256 versus 24.676
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 499.927 versus 301.168
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11724 versus 8496
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3336
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11724 versus 8496
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3336
- 7.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2304 versus 305
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 versus 25 October 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 1392 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz versus 1392 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s versus 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 versus 768 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 7 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16398 versus 6332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 versus 650 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 91678 versus 20732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 versus 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 versus 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 versus 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 versus 24.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 versus 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 versus 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 versus 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2304 versus 305 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 300 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon VII | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16398 | 6332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 | 650 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 91678 | 20732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 | 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 | 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 | 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 | 24.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 | 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2304 | 305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon VII | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Vega 20 | GP107 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | |
| Génération GCN | 5th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 | 25 October 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $139 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 237 | 487 |
| Prix maintenant | $699.99 | $159.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.74 | 46.07 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 60 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 768 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 115.26 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 3840 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13,230 million | 3,300 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,138 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 305 mm | 145 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 W | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 1024 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon VII avec des autres
AMDRadeon VII vs
NVIDIATesla P40
AMDRadeon VII vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
AMDRadeon VII vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600M
AMDRadeon VII vs
AMDRadeon 780M
AMDRadeon VII vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
AMDRadeon VII vs
AMDRadeon 740M
