AMD Radeon VII vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon VII und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon VII
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 1% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1400 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- Etwa 26% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1750 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 6.5x mehr Texturfüllrate: 432.24 GT/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 3840 vs 768
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- 285.7x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 2000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16398 vs 6332
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 vs 650
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 91678 vs 20732
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 vs 75.758
- 5.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 vs 843.503
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 vs 5.071
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.256 vs 24.676
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 499.927 vs 301.168
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11724 vs 8496
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3687
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3336
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11724 vs 8496
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3687
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3336
- 7.6x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2304 vs 305
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 7 February 2019 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1400 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1750 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 432.24 GT/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 3840 vs 768 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16398 vs 6332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 vs 650 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 91678 vs 20732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 vs 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 vs 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 vs 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 vs 24.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 vs 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 vs 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 vs 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2304 vs 305 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- 4x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon VII | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16398 | 6332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 | 650 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 91678 | 20732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 | 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 | 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 | 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 | 24.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 | 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2304 | 305 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon VII | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 5.1 | Pascal |
| Codename | Vega 20 | GP107 |
| Design | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | |
| GCN-Generierung | 5th Gen | |
| Startdatum | 7 February 2019 | 25 October 2016 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $699 | $139 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 237 | 487 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $699.99 | $159.99 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 32.74 | 46.07 |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1750 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 60 | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1400 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
| Leitungssysteme | 3840 | 768 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 115.26 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 3840 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 432.24 GT/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 13,230 million | 3,300 million |
| CUDA-Kerne | 768 | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,138 gflops | |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 97 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort Anzahl | 3 | |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 305 mm | 145 mm |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 750 W | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 2x 8-pin | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Speicher mit hoher Bandbreite (HBM) | ||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 1024 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 4096 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
| Speichertyp | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
