AMD Radeon VII vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon VII and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon VII

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1392 MHz
  • Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 1392 MHz
  • 6.5x more texture fill rate: 432.24 GT/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
  • 5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 768
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
  • 285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16398 vs 6332
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 vs 650
  • 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 91678 vs 20732
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 vs 75.758
  • 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 vs 843.503
  • 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 vs 5.071
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.256 vs 24.676
  • Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 499.927 vs 301.168
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11724 vs 8496
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3687
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3336
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11724 vs 8496
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3687
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3336
  • 7.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2304 vs 305
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 February 2019 vs 25 October 2016
Core clock speed 1400 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Boost clock speed 1750 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Texture fill rate 432.24 GT/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3840 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 14 nm
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 16398 vs 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark 792 vs 650
Geekbench - OpenCL 91678 vs 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 206.353 vs 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4659.199 vs 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 21.606 vs 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 69.256 vs 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 499.927 vs 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11724 vs 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11724 vs 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 vs 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2304 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

  • 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 300 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
16398
6332
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
792
650
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
91678
20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
206.353
75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4659.199
843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21.606
5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
69.256
24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
499.927
301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11724
8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11724
8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
305
Name AMD Radeon VII NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark 16398 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark 792 650
Geekbench - OpenCL 91678 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 206.353 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4659.199 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 21.606 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 69.256 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 499.927 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11724 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11724 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2304 305

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon VII NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.1 Pascal
Code name Vega 20 GP107
Design AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega
GCN generation 5th Gen
Launch date 7 February 2019 25 October 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $699 $139
Place in performance rating 237 487
Price now $699.99 $159.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 32.74 46.07

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1750 MHz 1392 MHz
Compute units 60
Core clock speed 1400 MHz 1392 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 3.46 TFLOPs
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 27.7 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 13.8 TFLOPs
Pipelines 3840 768
Pixel fill rate 115.26 GP/s
Stream Processors 3840
Texture fill rate 432.24 GT/s 66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 13,230 million 3,300 million
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 2,138 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count 3
DisplayPort support
HDMI
VGA
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 305 mm 145 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 750 W
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin None

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 1024 GB/s 112 GB / s
Memory bus width 4096 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 7 GB/s
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
FreeSync
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready
ZeroCore
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection