AMD Radeon Vega 11 versus AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 11 and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 11
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 43% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 57.2 GTexel / s versus 40 GTexel / s
- Environ 10% de pipelines plus haut: 704 versus 640
- Environ 43% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,830 gflops versus 1,280 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 versus 462
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.582 versus 33.836
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.156 versus 3.01
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 versus 49.787
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 versus 153.657
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 15 February 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.2 GTexel / s versus 40 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 704 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,830 gflops versus 1,280 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 versus 462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 versus 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 versus 3.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 versus 49.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 versus 153.657 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2174 versus 1857
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 versus 13318
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 506.712 versus 371.843
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3707 versus 2156
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 versus 2475
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 versus 3343
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3707 versus 2156
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 versus 2475
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 versus 3343
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2174 versus 1857 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14263 versus 13318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 506.712 versus 371.843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3707 versus 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4524 versus 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 14630 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3707 versus 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4524 versus 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 14630 versus 3343 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1857 | 2174 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 | 462 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13318 | 14263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | 506.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | 3.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | 49.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | 153.657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 14630 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 14630 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 711 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 11 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Owl | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 15 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 886 | 557 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,830 gflops | 1,280 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 704 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.2 GTexel / s | 40 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,500 million |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 11 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
ATIRadeon X300
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 PRO
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GX2
