AMD Radeon Vega 3 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 3 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 3
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 64 Watt
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.933 versus 15.139
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.006 versus 23.651
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 versus 1427
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 versus 2153
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 versus 1427
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 versus 2153
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 29 May 2014 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 versus 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 versus 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 versus 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 versus 2153 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- 3.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 993 MHz versus 300 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 31.78 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 99% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 384.0 gflops
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 versus 889
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 versus 303
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4271 versus 3963
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.994 versus 10.049
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 291.627 versus 183.156
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.023 versus 0.75
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1790 versus 1412
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1790 versus 1412
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 513 versus 418
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 384.0 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 versus 889 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 versus 303 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 versus 3963 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 versus 10.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 versus 183.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 versus 0.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 versus 1412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 versus 1412 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 versus 418 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 | 513 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Owl | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 29 May 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1267 | 1270 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89 | |
Prix maintenant | $94.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.87 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 993 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12 GTexel / s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |