AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient versus AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 versus 896
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 versus 304
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 versus 12.111
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 versus 1.211
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 versus 23.777
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 versus 73.506
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 versus 1645
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 versus 2426
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 1677
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 versus 1645
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 versus 2426
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 1677
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 versus 30 June 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 780 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 versus 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 versus 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 versus 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 versus 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 versus 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 versus 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 versus 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 versus 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 versus 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 versus 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 1677 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 730 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 253.178 versus 176.928
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 versus 176.928 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 1677 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Raven | Oland |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 | 30 June 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 931 | 1199 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 780 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 730 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,040 million |
Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 |