AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 780 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 896
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 304
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 12.111
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 1.211
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 vs 23.777
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 73.506
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 1645
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2426
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1677
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 1645
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2426
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1677
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 vs 30 June 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 vs 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 vs 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 vs 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 vs 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 vs 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 vs 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 1677 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 253.178 vs 176.928
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 vs 176.928 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 1677 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Raven | Oland |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 | 30 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 931 | 1199 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 730 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |