AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient versus NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA GeForce 945M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 versus 240
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 versus 107.094
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 versus 27 October 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 versus 240 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 versus 107.094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- 3.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2109 versus 1894
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 versus 26.039
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 380.461 versus 176.928
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.988 versus 1.666
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.027 versus 27.603
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2961 versus 2408
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3170
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2961 versus 2408
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3170
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 versus 1894 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 versus 26.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 versus 176.928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 versus 1.666 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 versus 27.603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 versus 2408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 versus 2408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3170 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 2109 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 240 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 28.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 380.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 1.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 31.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 107.094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Raven | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 | 27 October 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 972 | 973 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,870 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
ATIFireGL T2-128
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1100
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
ATIRadeon HD 5730
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
AMDFirePro W4100
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945M
