AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient versus NVIDIA GRID K2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA GRID K2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 6.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 versus 319
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 versus 18.943
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 versus 114.144
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 versus 344
- 10.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 312
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 versus 344
- 10.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 312
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 versus 11 May 2013 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 versus 319 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 versus 18.943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 versus 114.144 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 versus 344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 versus 344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 312 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K2
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 745 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 versus 1894
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 versus 176.928
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.51 versus 1.666
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.988 versus 27.603
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 versus 2408
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 versus 2408
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 745 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 versus 1894 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 968.568 versus 176.928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.51 versus 1.666 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.988 versus 27.603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6371 versus 2408 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6371 versus 2408 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K2
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 2737 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 319 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 18.943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 968.568 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 2.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 32.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 114.144 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 6371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 6371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 312 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10446 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA GRID K2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Raven | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 | 11 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 973 | 975 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,199 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 3,540 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,289 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2x 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 2x 160.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 980 XGL
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
ATIFireGL T2-128
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIATesla K20c
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGRID K2
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620
