Apple M1 7-core versus AMD Radeon R7 370
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Apple M1 7-core and AMD Radeon R7 370 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Apple M1 7-core
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 5 nm versus 28 nm
- 7.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 14 Watt versus 110 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10433 versus 7102
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10433 versus 7102
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Nov 2020 versus 18 June 2015 |
| Processus de fabrication | 5 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt versus 110 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 versus 7102 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 versus 7102 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 versus 3359 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 370
- 146.3x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 7
- 4.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 versus 18823
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 7 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 versus 18823 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Apple M1 7-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Apple M1 7-core | AMD Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18823 | 86561 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 | 7102 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 | 7102 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3359 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4516 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Apple M1 7-core | AMD Radeon R7 370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Date de sortie | 10 Nov 2020 | 18 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 423 | 420 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
| Nom de code | Trinidad | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1278 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 590 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4750 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.290 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 7 | 1024 |
| Render output units | 28 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Vitesse augmenté | 975 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,997 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 1024 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.4 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 66.67 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR4X-4266 | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 975 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 152 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Apple M1 7-core avec des autres
AppleM1 7-core vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 350
AppleM1 7-core vs
AMDRadeon HD 7990
AppleM1 7-core vs
AMDRadeon R7 370
AppleM1 7-core vs
AMDFirePro W4300
AppleM1 7-core vs
AMDRadeon Pro V340 MxGPU
AppleM1 7-core vs
AppleM1 8-core
