Apple M1 7-core versus AMD Radeon R7 370
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Apple M1 7-core and AMD Radeon R7 370 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Apple M1 7-core
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 5 nm versus 28 nm
- 7.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 14 Watt versus 110 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10433 versus 7102
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10433 versus 7102
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 Nov 2020 versus 18 June 2015 |
Processus de fabrication | 5 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt versus 110 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 versus 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 versus 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 versus 3359 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 370
- 146.3x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 7
- 4.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 versus 18824
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 7 |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 versus 18824 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Apple M1 7-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Apple M1 7-core | AMD Radeon R7 370 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18824 | 86561 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3359 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4511 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Apple M1 7-core | AMD Radeon R7 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Date de sortie | 10 Nov 2020 | 18 June 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 423 | 420 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
Nom de code | Trinidad | |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1278 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 590 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4750 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.290 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 7 | 1024 |
Render output units | 28 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 110 Watt |
Vitesse augmenté | 975 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,997 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.4 GTexel / s | |
Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 66.67 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Genre de mémoire | LPDDR4X-4266 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 975 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 152 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 |