Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 versus 603
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 205
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 versus 2223
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 versus 3.396
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 87.094
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.243
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 versus 5.005
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.361 versus 3.764
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 1624
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 1624
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 11 October 2010 |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 49 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 versus 603 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 205 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 versus 2223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 versus 3.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 versus 87.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 versus 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 versus 3.764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 versus 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 versus 1624 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- 3.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 11.2 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s
- 4.8x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 20
- 5.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 268.8 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 versus 988
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1713 versus 1702
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 versus 988
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 versus 1702
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 400 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 versus 1702 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 603 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 205 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 2223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 3.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 87.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 0.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 3.764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 1624 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 11 October 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 1505 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Prix maintenant | $35.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 11.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA par GPU | 96 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 4600 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 530 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
