Intel HD Graphics 5500 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 14.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 215 Watt
| Date de sortie | 5 September 2014 versus 26 March 2010 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
- 12.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 100 MHz
- 18.7x plus de pipelines: 448 versus 24
- 5.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3134 versus 594
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 414 versus 230
- 4.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11089 versus 2262
- 8.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.93 versus 3.422
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 980.005 versus 195.811
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3873 versus 781
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3614 versus 754
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3317 versus 1397
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3873 versus 781
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3614 versus 754
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3317 versus 1397
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 448 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3134 versus 594 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 versus 230 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11089 versus 2262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.93 versus 3.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 980.005 versus 195.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3873 versus 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3614 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3317 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3873 versus 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3614 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3317 versus 1397 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 594 | 3134 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 414 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2262 | 11089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.422 | 27.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 | 980.005 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 781 | 3873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | 3614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1397 | 3317 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 | 3873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | 3614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 | 3317 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 233 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.268 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.309 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.852 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Broadwell GT2 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 5 September 2014 | 26 March 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1478 | 790 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Prix maintenant | $522.01 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 6.87 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 100 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 448 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,300 million | 3,100 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 448 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,088.6 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way3-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pins | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 1280 MB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 133.9 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 5500 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
ATIMobility FireGL 7800
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7350 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
IntelHD Graphics 615
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 DDR4
