Intel HD Graphics 615 versus Intel HD Graphics 5500
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 615 and Intel HD Graphics 5500 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 615
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- 3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 300 MHz versus 100 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 950 MHz
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 709 versus 590
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3038 versus 2265
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.486 versus 3.422
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.572 versus 195.811
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1128 versus 781
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1128 versus 754
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2409 versus 1397
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1128 versus 781
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1128 versus 754
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2409 versus 1397
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 5 September 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz versus 100 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 950 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 versus 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3038 versus 2265 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 versus 3.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.572 versus 195.811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 versus 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1128 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 versus 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1128 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 versus 1397 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 versus 186
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 versus 186 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 615
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 615 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 | 590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 | 233 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3038 | 2265 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 | 3.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.572 | 195.811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.292 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 | 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1128 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 | 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1128 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 | 1397 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 233 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 615 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Broadwell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1485 | 1486 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 950 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 100 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |