Intel HD Graphics 630 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 27.6 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 24 versus 20
- 8.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 441.6 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 versus 630
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4554 versus 3210
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 versus 8.844
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 versus 171.17
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 versus 1.115
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 versus 10.385
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.567 versus 12.361
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 versus 988
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 2808
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 versus 988
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 2808
- 2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 388 versus 194
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 3 June 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 24 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 versus 630 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 versus 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 versus 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 versus 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 versus 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 versus 194 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 400 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 268
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 268 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 3 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1216 | 1359 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 400 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 20 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |