Intel HD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 81% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 27.6 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- Environ 21% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 441.6 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 19 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 versus 623
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 versus 212
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4554 versus 1946
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 versus 6.705
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 versus 100.391
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 versus 0.441
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 versus 8.146
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.567 versus 20.64
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 versus 977
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 versus 1494
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 1833
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 versus 977
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 versus 1494
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 1833
- 2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 388 versus 192
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 27 March 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 19 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 versus 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 versus 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 versus 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 versus 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 versus 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 versus 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 versus 192 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK208B |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 27 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1216 | 1488 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 954 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |