Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 888 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 8.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 130 Watt
- 42.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 1536 MB
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 versus 32.718
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3325
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3325
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 22 August 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 888 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 130 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 1536 MB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 versus 32.718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 72
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 versus 450.087
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 versus 3.059
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 versus 25.346
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.697 versus 67.077
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 versus 1668
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 versus 1668
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 72 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 versus 450.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 versus 3.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 versus 25.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.697 versus 67.077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 versus 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 versus 1668 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8759 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | 32.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | 1021.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | 3.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | 56.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT4e | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 22 August 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 993 | 820 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 1152 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,046 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 85.25 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 1536 MB |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 134.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 avec des autres
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDFirePro M5950
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
IntelArc A350M
