Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 30 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 versus 2433
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 versus 9864
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 36.898
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 versus 170.785
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 versus 1.373
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 versus 18.937
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 versus 160.823
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 versus 3629
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3684
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3331
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 versus 3629
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3684
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3331
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 17 May 2017 |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 30 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 versus 2433 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 versus 9864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 36.898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 versus 170.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 versus 1.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 versus 18.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 versus 160.823 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 versus 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 versus 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3331 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- 4.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 52% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 versus 383
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 versus 383 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 2433 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 442 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 9864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 36.898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 170.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 1.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 18.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 160.823 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3331 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | N17P-G1 |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 17 May 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 594 | 874 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1670 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 48 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12_1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |