Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon HD 7970M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 68 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 6.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 51.181
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1138.276 versus 1121.002
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 versus 5094
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3339
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 versus 5094
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3339
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 24 April 2012 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 68 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 51.181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 versus 1121.002 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 versus 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 versus 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3339 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970M
- 2.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 384
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3847 versus 2687
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 550 versus 354
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22410 versus 12205
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.355 versus 4.596
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.527 versus 61.742
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 256.99 versus 193.829
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3847 versus 2687 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 550 versus 354 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22410 versus 12205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.355 versus 4.596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.527 versus 61.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 256.99 versus 193.829 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 | 3847 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 | 550 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12205 | 22410 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 51.181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | 1121.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | 5.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | 81.527 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | 256.99 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | Wimbledon |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 24 April 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 622 | 566 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 48 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 2,176 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Largeur | IGP | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 153.6 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |