Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 59.72 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 16 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 versus 292
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 67.209
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.292 versus 799.414
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.572 versus 4.536
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.728 versus 30.523
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 1 February 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 59.72 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 versus 292 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.292 versus 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.572 versus 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.728 versus 30.523 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- 4.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1354 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 36% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1493 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 versus 2680
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17470 versus 12009
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 versus 193.589
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 versus 5609
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 versus 5609
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 versus 2680 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17470 versus 12009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 versus 193.589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 versus 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 versus 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2680 | 4462 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 292 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12009 | 17470 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.292 | 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.572 | 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.728 | 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.589 | 223.683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 7239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 7239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2084 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | GP106B |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 February 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 622 | 624 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 59.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,911 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 avec des autres
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 120M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon R7 360
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
