Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 76.86 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.834 versus 55.077
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.453 versus 830.773
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.575 versus 4.132
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 versus 5431
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 1123
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 2678
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 versus 5431
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 1123
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 2678
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 10 November 2016 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 76.86 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.834 versus 55.077 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.453 versus 830.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.575 versus 4.132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 versus 5431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 2678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 versus 5431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 2678 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- 3.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1125 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1201 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 384
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3641 versus 2688
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 versus 374
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17712 versus 12013
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 versus 61.742
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.985 versus 193.592
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1125 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1201 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3641 versus 2688 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 versus 374 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17712 versus 12013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 versus 61.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 versus 193.592 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2688 | 3641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | 634 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12013 | 17712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.834 | 55.077 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.453 | 830.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.575 | 4.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | 82.584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.592 | 225.985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 5431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 5431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2678 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | Baffin |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 10 November 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 626 | 623 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Prix maintenant | $259.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.63 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1201 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 76.86 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,460 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 avec des autres
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M270X
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
