Intel UHD Graphics 610 versus Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 610 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 610
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1241 versus 878
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1241 versus 878
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 versus 1 September 2017 |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 versus 878 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 versus 693
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 versus 171
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 versus 2697
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 versus 1071
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 versus 1071
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 versus 1699
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 versus 1699
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 versus 693 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 versus 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 versus 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 versus 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 versus 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 versus 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 versus 1699 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 4592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 2227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT1 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1350 | 1380 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |