Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus AMD Radeon HD 7850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon HD 7850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 15x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 225 Watt
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 5 March 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7850
- Environ 91% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 55.04 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 42.7x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 24
- 3.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,761 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- 3.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3885 versus 1237
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 versus 299
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.041 versus 27.517
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1028.005 versus 354.254
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.41 versus 1.807
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 72.975 versus 20.323
- 8.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 249.482 versus 29.327
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6173 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3696 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3309
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6173 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3696 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3309
- 19.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1312 versus 68
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.04 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,761 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3885 versus 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 versus 299 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.041 versus 27.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 versus 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.41 versus 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 versus 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 versus 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6173 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6173 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1312 versus 68 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 3885 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 567 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 47.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 1028.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 4.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 72.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 249.482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 1312 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | Pitcairn |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 5 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 520 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Prix maintenant | $449.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 1,761 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1024 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1200 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 153.6 GB/s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1200 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
