Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 versus 1170
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 versus 295
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 versus 3771
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 11.448
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 versus 206.777
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 0.792
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 versus 14.637
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 versus 20.86
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 5 June 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 versus 1170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 versus 295 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 versus 3771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 11.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 versus 206.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 versus 0.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 versus 14.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 versus 20.86 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- 2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 902 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 50% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 versus 1870
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2375 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 versus 3309
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 versus 1870
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2375 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 versus 3309
- 23x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1565 versus 68
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 902 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.86 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 versus 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 versus 68 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 1170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 295 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 3771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 11.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 206.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 0.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 14.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 20.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 1565 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 5 June 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 1158 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 902 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 28.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.51 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |