Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 64 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 versus 4271
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 11.994
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 versus 291.627
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 1.023
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 versus 15.139
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 versus 23.651
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 versus 1790
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 1427
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 2153
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 versus 1790
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 1427
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 2153
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 29 May 2014 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 versus 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 versus 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 versus 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 versus 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 versus 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 2153 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- 2.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 993 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 10% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 31.78 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 65% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 versus 1237
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 versus 299
- 7.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 513 versus 68
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 versus 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 versus 299 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 versus 68 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 513 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 29 May 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 1270 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89 | |
Prix maintenant | $94.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.87 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 993 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |