Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 11.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 170 Watt
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 25 June 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 170 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 2.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 94.1 billion / sec versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 48x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 24
- 5.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,378 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- 3.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 versus 1237
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 versus 299
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 versus 4657
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 versus 27.517
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 versus 354.254
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 versus 1.807
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 versus 20.323
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.186 versus 29.327
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3309
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3309
- 24.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 versus 68
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 94.1 billion / sec versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,378 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 versus 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 versus 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 versus 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 versus 27.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 versus 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 versus 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 versus 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 versus 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 versus 68 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 1659 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 25 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 576 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Prix maintenant | $249.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 2,378 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1152 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 94.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1152 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 500 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
