Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 40 nm
- 6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 versus 3114
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 versus 3114
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 versus 20 February 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 versus 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 versus 3114 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 736 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 9x plus de pipelines: 288 versus 32
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 versus 1887
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 versus 1887
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 736 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 288 versus 32 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1914 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.456 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 618.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.693 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.232 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.114 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 | 20 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 884 | 967 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 736 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 288 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 847.9 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 35.33 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 91.87 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3828 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X700
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAP106-090
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
