Intel UHD Graphics P630 versus NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics P630 and NVIDIA Quadro M500M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 128 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2075 versus 1171
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 versus 181
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2273 versus 1729
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2273 versus 1729
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2075 versus 1171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 versus 181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 versus 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 versus 1729 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- 2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6099 versus 5648
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2174 versus 2010
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3122 versus 3019
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2174 versus 2010
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3122 versus 3019
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6099 versus 5648 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 versus 2010 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3122 versus 3019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 versus 2010 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3122 versus 3019 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2075 | 1171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 181 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5648 | 6099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 2174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 2174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3122 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1082 | 1084 |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Architecture | Maxwell | |
| Nom de code | GM108 | |
| Date de sortie | 27 April 2016 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 128 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR3 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |

