NVIDIA GeForce 940MX versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 10x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3340
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3340
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 versus 30 May 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 230 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 versus 103.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 954 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 993 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 134 billion / sec versus 23.83 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 384
- 4.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 762.6 gflops
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7012 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 3.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5939 versus 1516
- 3.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 versus 172
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18068 versus 6325
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.824 versus 28.91
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 versus 312.94
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.899 versus 1.83
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.06 versus 27.833
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 versus 2486
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 3587
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 versus 2486
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 3587
- 3.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2155 versus 585
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 954 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 993 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec versus 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 762.6 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5939 versus 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 versus 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18068 versus 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 versus 28.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 versus 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 versus 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 versus 27.833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 versus 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 versus 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 3587 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 versus 585 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 5939 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 562 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 18068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 49.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 1089.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 4.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 44.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 103.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 7412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 7412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 | 2155 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM108 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 | 30 May 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1071 | 515 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.45 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 1046 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 3,333 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s | 134 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 230 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 224.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 7012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |