NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 1020 MHz
- Environ 54% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 60 Watt
- 1200x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 133.458
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 18 February 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 1020 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 60 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 3329 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 2433
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 versus 442
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 9864
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 36.898
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 170.785
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 1.373
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 versus 18.937
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 3629
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 3629
- 3.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 117 versus 35
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 2433 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 versus 442 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 9864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 36.898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 170.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 1.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 versus 18.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 3629 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 versus 35 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 3901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 521 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 11526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 | 117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Nom de code | N17P-G1 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | $149 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 874 | 707 |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | $299.01 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | 15.02 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 60 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |