NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1048 MB versus 512 MB
- 2.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 425 versus 396
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 versus 88
Caractéristiques | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1048 MB versus 512 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 425 versus 396 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 versus 88 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 6.0 billion / sec versus 2.8 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 48
- Environ 43% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 192 gflops versus 134.4 gflops
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1583 versus 1163
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.329 versus 3.121
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.162 versus 109.787
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.306 versus 8.55
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 737 versus 660
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 versus 1158
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2906 versus 1626
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 737 versus 660
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 versus 1158
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 versus 1626
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.0 billion / sec versus 2.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 192 gflops versus 134.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1583 versus 1163 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.329 versus 3.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.162 versus 109.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.306 versus 8.55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 737 versus 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 versus 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 versus 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 737 versus 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 versus 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 versus 1626 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 425 | 396 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 88 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1163 | 1583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.121 | 4.329 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.787 | 162.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.55 | 12.306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 660 | 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1158 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1626 | 2906 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 660 | 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1158 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1626 | 2906 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.426 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 3 September 2010 | 3 September 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1517 | 1518 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 134.4 gflops | 192 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2.8 GTexel / s | 6.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 23 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1048 MB | 512 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | (G)DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |