NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- 3.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1120 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 40 nm versus 55 nm
Date de sortie | 3 September 2010 versus 1 November 2009 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm versus 55 nm |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.025 versus 4.184
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 512.106 versus 172.058
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.497 versus 0.459
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.201 versus 8.145
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 83.628 versus 13.944
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.025 versus 4.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 512.106 versus 172.058 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.497 versus 0.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.201 versus 8.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 83.628 versus 13.944 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 521 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.184 | 6.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 172.058 | 512.106 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.459 | 0.497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.145 | 19.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.944 | 83.628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 690 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Nom de code | GF108 | RS880 |
Date de sortie | 3 September 2010 | 1 November 2009 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1572 | 1575 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz | 350 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Performance á point flottant | 215.04 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.7 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 181 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |