NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 11.8 billion / sec versus 11.2 billion / sec
- Environ 6% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 284.16 gflops versus 268.8 gflops
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2363 versus 2223
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.651 versus 3.396
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 213.211 versus 87.094
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.624 versus 0.243
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.521 versus 5.005
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.978 versus 3.764
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 versus 1713
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 versus 1713
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 January 2011 versus 11 October 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.8 billion / sec versus 11.2 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 284.16 gflops versus 268.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2363 versus 2223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.651 versus 3.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 213.211 versus 87.094 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.624 versus 0.243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.521 versus 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.978 versus 3.764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 versus 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 versus 1713 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- Environ 89% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 740 MHz
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 603 versus 570
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 versus 116
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 versus 1056
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1624 versus 1352
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 versus 1056
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1624 versus 1352
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 740 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 603 versus 570 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 versus 116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 versus 1056 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1624 versus 1352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 versus 1056 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1624 versus 1352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 570 | 603 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 116 | 205 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2363 | 2223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.651 | 3.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 213.211 | 87.094 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.624 | 0.243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.521 | 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.978 | 3.764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1056 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1352 | 1624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1056 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1352 | 1624 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 5 January 2011 | 11 October 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1504 | 1505 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Prix maintenant | $35.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 740 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Performance á point flottant | 284.16 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.8 billion / sec | 11.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 49 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA par GPU | 96 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
3D Vision |