NVIDIA Quadro 3000M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro 3000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
Environ 53% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 18 GTexel / s versus 11.8 billion / sec
2.5x plus de pipelines: 240 versus 96
Environ 52% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 432.0 gflops versus 284.16 gflops
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 900 MHz
Environ 75% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 998 versus 570
2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 versus 116
Environ 60% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3773 versus 2363
2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.95 versus 4.651
Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 325.007 versus 213.211
Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.865 versus 0.624
Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.794 versus 10.521
Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.961 versus 23.978

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	22 February 2011 versus 5 January 2011
Taux de remplissage de la texture	18 GTexel / s versus 11.8 billion / sec
Pipelines	240 versus 96
Performance á point flottant	432.0 gflops versus 284.16 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	2 GB versus 1 GB
Vitesse de mémoire	2500 MHz versus 900 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	998 versus 570
PassMark - G2D Mark	315 versus 116
Geekbench - OpenCL	3773 versus 2363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.95 versus 4.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	325.007 versus 213.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.865 versus 0.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	13.794 versus 10.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.961 versus 23.978

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

Environ 64% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 740 MHz versus 450 MHz
2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 75 Watt
4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1056 versus 218
4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 versus 374
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1352 versus 543
4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1056 versus 218
4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 versus 374
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1352 versus 543

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	740 MHz versus 450 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt versus 75 Watt
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1056 versus 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1790 versus 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1352 versus 543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1056 versus 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1790 versus 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1352 versus 543

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

998

570

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

315

116

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3773

2363

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.95

4.651

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

325.007

213.211

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.865

0.624

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13.794

10.521

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.961

23.978

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

218

1056

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

374

1790

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

543

1352

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

218

1056

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

374

1790

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

543

1352

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro 3000M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
PassMark - G3D Mark	998	570
PassMark - G2D Mark	315	116
Geekbench - OpenCL	3773	2363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.95	4.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	325.007	213.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.865	0.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	13.794	10.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.961	23.978
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	218	1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	374	1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	543	1352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	218	1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	374	1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	543	1352

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro 3000M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
Essentiel
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi
Nom de code	GF104	GF108
Date de sortie	22 February 2011	5 January 2011
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$398.96
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1502	1504
Prix maintenant	$199.95
Genre	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	7.98
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	450 MHz	740 MHz
Performance á point flottant	432.0 gflops	284.16 gflops
Processus de fabrication	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	240	96
Taux de remplissage de la texture	18 GTexel / s	11.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,950 million	585 million
Noyaux CUDA		96
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Taille du laptop	large	large
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	80.0 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	2500 MHz	900 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	DDR3
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
CUDA
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus