NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M versus AMD Radeon HD 7570M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Radeon HD 7570M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 753 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 555 versus 428
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2571 versus 1090
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.332 versus 3.109
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 versus 199.164
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 versus 0.333
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 versus 10.489
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 versus 1797
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 versus 2352
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 versus 1797
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 versus 2352
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 7 January 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 555 versus 428 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2571 versus 1090 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.332 versus 3.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 versus 199.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 versus 0.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 versus 10.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 versus 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 versus 2352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 versus 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 versus 2352 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7570M
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 400 versus 144
- Environ 89% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 480.0 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 13 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 78% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3200 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 191 versus 171
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 versus 22.728
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 905 versus 800
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 905 versus 800
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 400 versus 144 |
Performance á point flottant | 480.0 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 191 versus 171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.722 versus 22.728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 905 versus 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 905 versus 800 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | AMD Radeon HD 7570M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 555 | 428 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 191 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2571 | 1090 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.332 | 3.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 | 199.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | 0.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 | 10.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 | 42.722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 800 | 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 2352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 800 | 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 2352 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | AMD Radeon HD 7570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF116 | Thames |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 7 January 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1446 | 1447 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | 650 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 144 | 400 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 13 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 716 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 500 MHz | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |