NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M versus NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and NVIDIA Quadro 1000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 144 versus 96
- Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2571 versus 2131
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.332 versus 5.218
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 versus 0.52
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 versus 10.149
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 versus 1633
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 versus 2327
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 versus 1633
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 versus 2327
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 13 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 144 versus 96 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2571 versus 2131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.332 versus 5.218 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 versus 0.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 versus 10.149 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 versus 1633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 versus 2327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 versus 1633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 versus 2327 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
- Environ 6% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 268.8 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 565 versus 555
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 versus 171
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 207.789 versus 205.545
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.677 versus 22.728
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 894 versus 800
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 894 versus 800
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 565 versus 555 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 versus 171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 207.789 versus 205.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.677 versus 22.728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 894 versus 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 894 versus 800 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | NVIDIA Quadro 1000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 555 | 565 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2571 | 2131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.332 | 5.218 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 | 207.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | 0.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 | 10.149 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 | 23.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 800 | 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | 1633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 2327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 800 | 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | 1633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 2327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | NVIDIA Quadro 1000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF116 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 13 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1446 | 1449 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $174.95 | |
| Prix maintenant | $99.95 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 144 | 96 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 585 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 1000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7650A
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7570M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635M vs
NVIDIANVS 5400M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
